My Guelph exploits are on hold with reading week around the corner and midterms almost finished. I’m learning the hard way that balancing school and espresso is trickier than I thought. If I haven’t posted in a while, you can be sure I’m at home, cursing the homework Gods!
****
My entire, albeit short, espresso career has left me pondering what a “balanced” espresso really is. My mom hates espresso, but loves coffee, and therefore provides an interesting and valuable perspective. I’ve tasted shots that I thought were well balanced only to have her take a sip and dump them down the sink with a polite smile. (Don’t even ask me about the KIM CRAWFORD Sauvignon Blanc incident!). It seems that no matter how well balanced I find a shot, it is still a shock to the uninitiated’s palate.
During my Wine & Oenology class, my Prof brought in a guest speaker: Will Predhomme, the sommelier at Oliver & Bonacini’s CANOE in Toronto. After class I came to him with my dilemna. We had tasted a Pinot Noir (Norman Hardy 2009) that was described as acidic yet balanced. I have trouble with this. Isn’t balance a equal measure of (in the case of wine) acid/sweetness/tannin? How can a wine be both acidic and balanced? I asked Will, and he described balance in the context of the varietal (type of grape). It’s balanced for a Pinot Noir (which tend to be more acidic), whereas another wine from a different grape may be may be less acidic and more sweet, but still considered balanced for that grape.
How does this transfer to espresso? The most obvious connection is with single origin (SO) espresso. Basically, SO coffee is from a specific region that is not blended, and therefore doesn’t have as full or round a taste profile as other coffee blends. It is intrinsically less balanced than an espresso blend, yet some declare select SO coffees “balanced”. Perhaps these are balanced “in the context of the bean”?
To be honest, I’m still confused. The only solution: drink more coffee.
Keep your stick on the ice.






